Agenda item

Summary of Findings of the Review of the Functions, Responsibilities and Constitution of Planning Committees at Horsham District Council

Briefing from the Monitoring Officer. Finalised report of the Planning Advisory Service to follow when available


The Monitoring Officer presented a summary of the findings of the Committee’s review of the functions, responsibilities and constitution of the Council’s planning committees.


At the outset the Governance Committee had agreed that it should undertake a genuine, fair and professional review, with no preconceptions.


Initially four possible Planning Committee options were put forward for consideration:


  • Status quo (i.e. all Members sitting on one of two area-based committees);
  • Two area-based committees with number-limited membership;
  • Two committees – one for strategic/major applications and one for all other applications – with number-limited membership;

·         One committee for all applications with number-limited membership.


In undertaking the review the Committee had:


·         looked at whether the current structure, scheme of delegation and processes were efficient and effective and whether they met the needs (current and future) of the Council and its customers;

·         looked at how decision making might be improved whilst allowing for democratic input, together with good relationships between officers and Members;

·         visited and undertaken telephone interviews with five other local authorities in order to review and compare practices and procedures;

·         engaged the Planning Advisory Service (PAS) to undertake an independent peer review which included observing both the North and South Committees;

·         listened to the views and observations of the Director of Place and the Head of Development regarding the current operation of planning committees at the Council;

·         considered a number of documents relevant to the review, including:


o   Best Practice Protocol for the Operation of Planning committees - Department of Environment

o   HDC Constitution Extract - Scheme of delegation of responsibilities to Committees of the Council – Functions of Planning Committee

o   HDC Constitution Extract – Planning Protocol

o   Extract from the Productivity Review of Strategic Planning & Development Management June 2018

o   Review of Planning Decision Making Processes and Procedures – Havering Borough Council

o   Training Session Extract –14th September 2016

·         listened to the views of non-Committee Members at an all-Member seminar.


All the Councils visited or spoken to had undergone a change from running two or more geographical area planning committees to having a single planning committee with limited membership.  Using observations and comments received from the visits and telephone interviews, the advantages and disadvantages of a single committee were considered.


Whilst the final report of PAS was awaited, its initial observations and recommendations were reported.  The final report would be circulated to all Members when available.


Members discussed the summary of findings in detail.  Issues raised for further clarification included a request for a definition of undertaking of site visits by other authorities (e.g. organised whole committee visits/informal visits etc.) and whether any of the authorities operating a single planning committee with limited membership paid a Special Responsibility Allowance to members of the committee.


Members strongly agreed that mandatory training must be provided for members of planning committees and that, once provided, section 11 of the existing Planning Protocol should be enforced (i.e. Members who did not undertake the mandatory training would not be permitted to participate in decision making at meetings dealing with planning matters).


The Committee then agreed that detailed recommendations should be drawn up for consideration at the next meeting, based on the following drafts:


1.    All Members need to be adequately trained and must attend mandatory training which includes the entire planned programme – failure to do so needs to be effectively enforced. For example a minimum of four half day sessions (subject to advice from Planning Officers), first session to be included within the induction programme for Members.


2.    Single Planning Committee limited by numbers adopted by the majority of Local Planning Authorities throughout the UK.


3.    Two area committee served by all members with improvements made by the following further recommendations.


4.    Review/changes to delegations - an application costs significantly more to process when the decision is taken at committee rather than under delegated powers. It is therefore important to ensure that Planning Committee only deals with those matters that it really needs to. Review and possible revision of call-ins, including the number of representations from the public, and their location, required to trigger a call-in. Major applications given indicative thresholds subject to advice from Planning Officers.


5.    Site visits to be undertaken differently and a revised site visit protocol to be adopted. An up-front process that would require agreement from the Chairman of the Committee and the Planning Development Manager as to which sites are visited.


6.    Look for a suitable code of practice which sets out general rules for Member and Officer involvement at the pre-application stage subject to advice from Planning Officers.


7.    Ability for Members to opt out of Planning Committee if they choose to. Opting out can also be done by declining training, in any case.


8.    Independent Remuneration Panel to be asked to look at the payment of a Special Responsibility Allowance for members of planning committee (this can only be considered where the committee(s) are number-limited).


9.    Any changes agreed to be reviewed after 12 months of operation.