Issue - meetings

To consider the responses to the Members’ questionnaire on the revised governance arrangements

Mr Paul Kornycky addressed the Committee referring to his statement at the previous meeting regarding the lack of any public consultation on this issue.  His statement also suggested that consideration should be given to how the public could hold the Council to account with particular reference to the provisions within the Council’s Constitution regarding questions by members of the public at meetings of the Council.  The Chairman indicated that a response would be given to Mr Kornycky’s statement at the next meeting.

Following the approval of the Committee at its last meeting of the use of a questionnaire to conduct a Member review of the effectiveness of the governance changes introduced in 2016, the review had now been carried out and a summary of the results was submitted.  The Committee was pleased to note that almost two-thirds (64%) of Members had responded.

The quantitativefindings, which tested the five desired effects of: Member involvement; efficiency; accountability; timely decision making; and openness, all indicated that Members considered the governance changes had resulted in improvements.  

The qualitative findings from Members’ free-form comments were summarised and categorised as follows:

Endorsement – A number of comments had been made that supported the quantitative findings that Members had experienced an overall improvement in the areas of Member involvement, efficiency, accountability, timely decision making, and openness.

Information – Several comments indicated that Members considered that insufficient advance information was given in respect of issues to be discussed at the various Policy Development Advisory Groups (PDAGs) and it was therefore proposed that there should be a more structured approach to the publication of PDAG agendas, as set out in recommendation (ii) of the report.

Attendance – Comments had been made regarding poor attendance of some Members.  Attendance at meetings was a matter for individual Members and not something that could be addressed by the review.

General – A number of individual comments regarding number of meetings, availability of information, meeting recordings and use of technology had also been made.  Some of these were addressed by recommendations (iii) and (iv) in the report.  It was noted that audio recordings of all Council, Cabinet and committee meetings held in public would now be broadcast live and subsequently published (subject to room and technology parameters).  With regard to technology matters, Members were encouraged to work with officers to resolve any issues they had.

Members of the Committee discussed the findings of the review.  They expressed particular concern regarding the poor attendance at meetings of some Members and noted that later start times for some meetings during the previous year had had no discernible effect on attendance by either Members or members of the public.  The Committee noted the importance of PDAGs as ‘private thinking space’ for Members and a sounding board for Cabinet Members in the development of policy.   The advisory and non-decision making nature of these groups was also emphasised.  However, it was agreed that the availability of clearer information both before and during the meetings of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 12

Mr Paul Kornycky addressed the Committee referring to the proposal that the review would seek the views of Members but that no public consultation was proposed.  His statement also referred to the provisions within the Council’s Constitution regarding questions by members of the public at meetings of the Council, which was not part of the current review.

The Committee was reminded that, in April 2016, the Council had agreed revised governance arrangements including the appointment of a Policy Development Advisory Group (PDAG) for each Cabinet portfolio holder with a defined membership and timetable of meetings.  The agreed changes were intended to achieve:

·        Member involvement

·        efficiency, with clearer key-decision making responsibilities

·        accountability, with a strong scrutiny function and a clear line of Cabinet Member accountability

·        timely decision making

·        openness, with published PDAG agendas and minutes whilst allowing the PDAGs to benefit from ‘thinking space’ meetings.

It was noted that, in future, all Council, Cabinet, Committee and Sub-Committee meetings held in public would be recorded using the Audiominutes facility.

Council had agreed that these revised governance arrangements would be reviewed after one year of operation.  It was therefore proposed that all Members be invited to complete an electronic questionnaire, as submitted, over a four week period from 19^th June to 14^th July 2017 and that the Committee should then review the findings.

            RESOLVED

(i)         That the review method described in the report be approved and the questionnaire circulated to all Members on 19^th June 2017.

(ii)        That a further meeting of the Committee be held on a date to be agreed to receive a report on the results of the questionnaire.